AN SNP activist is suing the party over new rules which make it harder for MPs to seek election in the Scottish Parliament.
In July the national executive committee (NEC) switched its process so MPs would need to resign from Westminster as soon as they are selected for run for Holyrood.
The SNP’s justice spokesperson, Joanna Cherry QC, withdrew her effort to become the Edinburgh Central candidate when the rules were announced.
She has called the rule unfair and, writing for The National yesterday, accused members of the NEC of pushing “personal vendettas”.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Being on SNP’s NEC should be about independence, not personal vendettas
David Henry, an organiser for the party’s Edinburgh Pentlands constituency association and the secretary of the Sighthill & Stenhouse branch, is bringing forward a court action over the rules. The activist is suing the SNP for £5000 in membership fees and donations to the party.
Henry’s action names SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, business convener Kirsten Oswald and party lawyer Ian McCann.
In documents lodged with Edinburgh Sheriff Court and seen by The Times newspaper, Henry says: “All of this was in good faith because I believed the party was a force for good and that it abided by its constitution.
“The recent events prove that I have been misled and the respondents have failed to provide any evidence that the NEC acted in accordance with the standing orders of the national executive committee.”
The SNP has denied that the new rules agreed this summer were aimed at Cherry.
The party has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel