MATT Hancock has insisted "black lives matter" as he published a new review which found black, Asian and minority ethnic people were at significantly higher risk of dying from the coronavirus.
The study, from Public Health England, looked at the risk factors for coronavirus and found BAME individuals had a much higher risk of death than white people as do those from poorer backgrounds, men and anyone who is obese or suffering from diabetes.
The UK Government’s Health Secretary said the evidence showed that coronavirus targeted people in an "unequal and disproportionate way" and promised further work to find out how much of the disproportionate number of deaths among BAME communities was down to factors like their occupation, housing or other issues.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Sturgeon had 'no written briefings' on Covid for months
His Conservative colleague Kemi Badenoch would lead the next phase of the research, he said.
Earlier, Mr Hancock told the Commons: "Black lives matter as do those of the poorest areas of our country, which have worse health outcomes and we need to make sure all of these considerations are taken into account and action is taken to level-up the health outcomes of people across this country.
"Because there's no more important levelling-up than the levelling-up of your life expectancy and the quality of health with which you live that life."
The Secretary of State said the Covid-19 epidemic had shown "huge disparities" across the nation.
"People are understandably angry about injustices and as Health Secretary I feel a deep responsibility because this pandemic has exposed huge disparities in the health of our nation," he explained.
"This work underlines that being black or from a minority ethnic background is a major risk factor.
"This racial disparity holds even after accounting for the effect of age, deprivation, region and sex."
The PHE report showed that, after accounting for the effect of gender, age, deprivation and region, people of Bangladeshi ethnicity had around twice the risk of death than people who were white British.
Those of Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, Other Asian, Caribbean and Other Black ethnicity had between a 10% and 50% higher risk of death when compared to white British.
Meanwhile, the highest diagnosis Covid-19 rates per 100,000 population were in black people [486 females and 649 males,] and are lowest in white people [220 in females and 224 in males.]
Compared to previous years, death from all causes were now almost four times higher than expected among black males, almost three times higher in Asian males and almost two times higher in white males.
Among females, deaths were almost three times higher in black, mixed and other females and 2.4 times higher in Asian females compared with 1.6 times in white females.
The study said the "relationship between ethnicity and health is complex and likely to be the result of a combination of factors".
For example, BAME people were likely to be at increased risk of acquiring the infection due to the fact they were more likely to live in urban areas, in overcrowded households, in deprived areas, and had jobs that exposed them to higher risk, the study said.
BAME communities were also likely to be at increased risk of poorer outcomes once they contracted Covid-19.
READ MORE: UK taxpayer picking up £17.5bn bill for furloughing of almost nine million workers
The study said some of this was due to underlying health issues with people of Bangladeshi and Pakistani background having higher rates of cardiovascular disease than people who were white British.
Black Caribbean and Black African people also had higher rates of blood pressure while Type 2 diabetes, which has obesity as its main driver, was more common in BAME individuals.
Professor John Newton, the Government's testing tzar, urged people not to jump to conclusions about the report.
While coronavirus outcomes were worse for people from black, Asian and minority ethnic people, more work was needed to find out why, he said.
"It is not necessarily because of their ethnicity, it may be related to their occupation or other reasons why they might be at higher levels of exposure," he told the Downing Street daily press conference.
In other developments:
*the Government believed the two-metre social distancing rule should remain in place, No 10 said, as the UK death toll passed 49,800;
*the UK's statistics watchdog criticised the Government over its handling of coronavirus testing data, saying the presentation of figures appeared to be aimed at showing "the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding";
*leading epidemiologist Professor Neil Ferguson, who quit as a Government adviser last month, said the UK's high death rate was partly due to the fact the country's epidemic actually began much earlier than scientists had predicted.
The PHE study also found that men working as security guards, taxi drivers and chauffeurs, bus and coach drivers, chefs, sales and retail assistants, lower skilled workers in construction and processing plants, and men and women working in social care, had significantly high rates of death from Covid-19.
Men of working age were also twice as likely to die as women, while when compared with those under 40, those who were 80 or older were 70 times more likely to die.
Compared with people under 40, the probability of death was about three times higher among those aged 40 to 49, nine times higher among those aged 50 to 59, 27 times higher among those aged 60 to 69 and 50 times higher among those aged 70 to 79.
Obesity and conditions such as Type 2 diabetes also increased the risk of dying from Covid-19, regardless of ethnicity.
PHE cited one study which included data from 17 million adults showing that, compared to those who were not obese, obese people were 27% more likely to die, rising to almost two-and-a-half times if they were morbidly obese.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel